data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd25f/fd25f56e5c4ad03c56451e79b3c470406b876407" alt=""
Twilight shot. Comparison to F200's EXR signal-to-noise (S/N) improvement mode where it
uses half as many pixels in order to boost the signal-to-noise.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/225f6/225f62078ea875c79d9b923d1d1de7329c566ebb" alt=""
Same shot, zoomed in on the gate sign to get an idea of the resolution.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4409/d4409a3ad04b4b45a8847ad7f6f4d305cd6f8d84" alt=""
Comparison of three F200 modes on a black cat in twilight, which is a challenge.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d0d3/6d0d350d6bf199e6da7e50d112544fa8a608b385" alt=""
Close-up of the last shot to see the resolution.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/601ae/601ae87eaab8af20a10cbe7564b55ee057a8696f" alt=""
F100 on the same cat, same conditions.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f18/30f18ad25ecf069d2ed3fd1482b20c8a8ce9855e" alt=""
Here, this plaque is about 30 yards away in sunlight, and I have both cameras on max zoom. The image is blown up to max resolution.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d48bf/d48bf7a1e08a541d7d57c63a6b85a9802f9d74e8" alt=""
Obligatory flower shot. I think the F100 shot is just a touch out of focus.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f462/9f462373f1f7e7c78c251d5763f12cf7440208ba" alt=""
Close-up of last shot.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68c9d/68c9d501d4f08289fed4e1b1d92eeafdac856cba" alt=""
Garden shot to demonstrate the EXR's dynamic range (EXR D/R) mode. I didn't notice much
difference among these shots.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17512/1751294c9d98108d32f907ab7a25b7a9e5095acb" alt=""
Indoor shot from about six feet with flash.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/266ca/266cae86fdf5233d4cc6174323ecc4e16f3d429a" alt=""
Close-up of last shot. The F100 seems to have better resolution in this case.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8242/f824257eb47c1feb168a4dae1ab870810f0053a5" alt=""
Flash suppressed this time, and I added the EXR's S/N mode.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe557/fe557cdd95141fb66a8b2ca20be3ee466e725fc7" alt=""
Close-up of last shot. Again, the F100 seems to have the best resolution.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61ad7/61ad7430beaf14903d5bac93e323f4af41efd36f" alt=""
Another dynamic range mode demo. Hard to see significant differences.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ebab/5ebab91607155e194e0f6dbb4cc24a8150944b73" alt=""
Close-up on the butterfly from the last shot.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed0c4/ed0c4318532e11e47ebbd1f4cbc7d4885cba30a1" alt=""
This time with fill-flash.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b414c/b414ce15e62d675fb4b68a5cd00137f215d10362" alt=""
Comparison of sport modes. Not much difference.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/864c2/864c2e3c6c4fe6a7956ff00c4e7129b78d0cae81" alt=""
Another dynamic range mode comparison.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ed98/0ed984fe97379a2f976b53180dbcdaaad5cfb3aa" alt=""
This was fun. At the park there was a gopher sneaking out of his hole. I managed to
capture it with both cameras (auto mode, sunlight), which is a small miracle.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10062/100621033213471daa24dfb49e6c4b30e0dc9e74" alt=""
Here the dynamic range mode really looks a bit different. Look at how much more saturated
the red blanket is in the third frame, for example.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed90c/ed90c0a5bea6be2e3583ce048487819992fe22fb" alt=""
Comparison of auto mode at 5x zoom in sunlight.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2dbb/d2dbb2b9d7e2a1a543797cc53d403a26393fe98b" alt=""
This picture was taken at night under a street lamp. The AF assist lamp was absolutely
critical for focusing. I probably didn't hold the camera as still for the F200 shot.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6d9a/e6d9a39695b81016fd70e427ebefc722bf4b1160" alt=""
Here's the same sign with flash. Taken from about 4 feet.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f2d/60f2d08b1c19b105aeac340674d8d5b4902fe688" alt=""
Ambient light, forced flash, auto. I'm a little disappointed that even when sized down
significantly, flash shots on the F200 look "speckled." I understand that Fuji wants to minimize
the flash in order to have the background show up better, but the resulting ISO of 800 doesn't
cut it for me.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40bf0/40bf0d075e756b246fee4df4f074ac7b033bb02b" alt=""
In a museum now, flash suppressed. Comparison to EXR's signal-to-noise (S/N) mode.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5681/b568142780ceecc29a2b9210017589596fef54dd" alt=""
Same thing, this time with some zoom. Note that the S/N mode does seem to look sharper here,
and it cleans up the yellow background that results in the "auto" mode.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7715a/7715a626ef1fdf4a2fa977a0de0f06e6db8ef1c8" alt=""
Close-up of last shot to demonstrate resolution.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62a1/c62a1bc1bfb57eba6dbce7b11c3f4e4fe97a1500" alt=""
A back-lit sign in a museum, no flash.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/211b0/211b0945a00ce7b132f3bc241d7baf01b8732ef5" alt=""
One more demo of the dynamic range mode.
|